Found cheaper? We match it — see conditions. Incorporation and secretary transfer also carry a 30-day money-back guarantee.
Written once. Filed away. Checked again only at the next planning meeting.

3
reasons a goal quietly stops being checked, none of them about ambition
Three reasons, not a verdict on the framework
WRITTEN-ONCE
Written once, in a room
Set at a planning session, then filed away — nobody's specific job to reopen it before the next one.
DISCONNECTED
Never connected to what's actually measured
The target lives in a slide deck. The number that would prove it moved — revenue, invoices, headcount — lives somewhere else entirely.
UNVERIFIABLE
Unverifiable by the time anyone asks
By the quarterly review, nobody can say with any confidence whether the number moved, or exactly when it stopped being checked.
+ none of this means the framework is wrong — OKRs work when someone keeps checking them, and that's exactly the step that quietly stops happening
+ goal & OKR planning is the session and the framework; checking it against real numbers afterward is a separate mechanism, covered next
What actually happens after most planning sessions
This is an illustrative example, not one company's real numbers — but it's the shape of the thing that happens after most quarterly planning sessions:
Nobody hid anything, and nobody was lazy. The revenue was sitting in the accounts the whole time — it just wasn't sitting next to the goal.
Deciding what matters is still yours
A number read from the account tells you whether a target is on track. It doesn't tell you whether the target was the right one, or what to do about the gap — chase sales harder, cut spend, move the target. That judgement call is still made by whoever's running the business, not by a dashboard.
True of any goal-tracking approach, framework or software: making a number visible is not the same as deciding what to do about it. Checking a key result against the real account removes the guesswork about whether it moved. It doesn't remove the decision about what happens next — that stays with leadership, same as it always did.
The one question that decides this
What happens the first time someone asks if a number actually moved
On the planning session itself, a good facilitator and OCTIS do the same job. The difference shows up the first time someone checks whether a number actually moved:
What checking against the real account actually changes
A key result gets a number attached, not just a sentence
a revenue figure, a headcount, an invoice count — something that already exists somewhere
That number already lives in the same account as the goal
the ledger, the invoices, the HR records — not a second system nobody logs into
The key result reads the number directly
not a percentage someone estimates and types in before the meeting
Progress is visible without anyone opening a second tool to check
so by week six there's an answer, not a guess
A standalone OKR tool or a facilitator only ever holds the goal itself — it has no view into your invoices, payroll or ledger, so 'progress' has to be reported by a person, on a schedule that depends on someone remembering to do it. Only a system already running the rest of the back office can read the real number instead of asking someone to report it.
What you don't have to build
0
extra spreadsheets or trackers to build after the session — the key result reads the same revenue, invoice and headcount numbers already in your OCTIS account.
What stops being your job to remember
This is what a quarter of 'keeping the goal current' usually costs, and what's left once checking is automatic:
That's the honest split: it removes the tracking, not the judgement.
What a session or a login can't reach
What they do well
A facilitator or a standalone OKR tool genuinely helps a team write a sharper goal than they'd write alone in a meeting room — that part of the work doesn't need us.
What their shape can't reach
Their job ends where the planning session, or the software login, does. Neither one holds your invoices, your payroll or your ledger — so 'progress' can only ever be what someone remembers to type in.
The goal gets written well either way. Whether anyone can tell if it moved depends on where it lives afterward.
From your direction to a goal that checks itself
There's no tier to pick and no price to show up front — Strategy & Coaching is quoted after a short call, once we know how many objectives and how much cascading you need. This is the actual sequence:
You tell us the direction
where the business is trying to get to, and roughly on what timeline
We scope it and quote it
how many objectives, how much facilitation, how much cascading to departments — priced for that engagement, not a flat card
We run the planning session
objectives and measurable key results, tied to real numbers already in your account where they exist
The dashboard tracks what it can, every week
revenue, invoices, headcount read automatically; anything outside the account still needs someone to update it by hand
Tying a key result to a real account number takes a short setup conversation, even when the number already exists — that step isn't instant, and we won't pretend it is.
Who does the work
OCTIS's strategy advisors
Planning sessions and goal cascades are facilitated by our advisory team, working from whatever bookkeeping, HR and sales data already sits in your account.
Price
Quoted after a short call
Strategy & Coaching has no fixed monthly price on this page — the quote depends on how many objectives and how much cascading the engagement covers.
Not included
The decision itself
The dashboard tells you if a number moved. Deciding what to do about it — chase harder, cut spend, change the target — is still a leadership call.
Not covered
account — revenue, invoices, headcount. A target tied to something outside the account, like a survey result or a manual audit, still needs someone to update it by hand.It's priced on the scope of the engagement — how many objectives the planning covers and how much the goals cascade across departments.
quotes it after a short scoping call rather than off a flat monthly card.
Three reasons recur: the goal is written once in a room and filed away with no one specifically tasked to reopen it, the target lives in a slide deck disconnected from the number that would prove it moved, and by the quarterly review nobody can say with confidence when it stopped being checked.
ties each key result to the real revenue, invoice or headcount number already in the account, so checking it isn't a separate step someone has to remember.
Yes — a key result only tracks itself automatically when the number behind it, such as revenue, invoices or headcount, is already recorded somewhere the tracking system can read.
's planning sessions can still run without that in place; that specific goal just won't track itself from day one.
No — automatic tracking applies only to numbers already recorded in a connected system, such as revenue, invoices or headcount; a qualitative measure like customer satisfaction still needs someone to update it by hand.
says this plainly rather than implying every goal tracks itself.
Once there are enough people that 'what matters this month' stops being obvious without writing it down — a team of two or three usually just needs to agree that out loud instead.
would rather say a formal engagement isn't needed yet than sell one to a team that size.
A dedicated strategy advisor or facilitator usually runs it, working from the business's existing financial and headcount data rather than a blank whiteboard.
's own strategy advisors facilitate sessions this way, using whatever bookkeeping and HR data already sits in the account.
The plan was never the point. Knowing whether it moved is.
Tell us where the business is trying to get to. We'll quote the planning, and tie the key results to numbers already in your account.