Lowest price guaranteed

Found cheaper? We match it — see conditions. Incorporation and secretary transfer also carry a 30-day money-back guarantee.

You're not documenting distrust. You're deciding while you still agree.

Two or three founders, a year in, nothing written down yet.

2

founders is where disputes start

What's actually in a shareholders' agreement

Four words, plainly defined

Vesting

Shares that become yours over time

Leave in month three, you don't keep a founder's stake.

Transfer

Who you can sell to

So you don't wake up with a stranger as a partner.

Deadlock

Two owners, stuck

What happens when neither side can move.

Reserved

Decisions above a simple vote

Usually the ones that change the company.

+ Drag-along / tag-along — if the majority sells, the minority follows (drag) or can insist on it (tag)

+ Constitution vs this agreement — the constitution is public and structural; this is private and covers control, exits and disputes in far more detail

What 'we trust each other' actually skips

What it looks like

We trust each other, so we don't need this written down.

What's actually true

Trust was never the thing being documented. Without it, a statute decides who can sell, who can block, and what a leaver keeps — and it wasn't written with your company in mind.

The only question is whether you pick that answer now, together, or find out later, separately.

And a lawyer's signature doesn't decide it for you either

Whoever drafts it, the founders are the ones who have to agree what's fair — that part was never outsourceable.

Malaysian company law — absent a shareholders' agreement, the constitution's default provisions and statutory minority-protection rules decide transfers and disputes instead. True whoever drafts your agreement.

The one question that decides this

Anyone can draft this agreement. Almost nobody can keep it attached to the company.

What a law firm and OCTIS both do

Today, a law firm and OCTIS both draft the same sound agreement. The difference only shows up later, as the company and its ownership change around it:

A law firm
Drafts a shareholders' agreement
Gets vesting, transfer restrictions, deadlock right
Knows Malaysian company law
Knows what's in the document today
Next year — knows the document you signed
OCTIS
Drafts a shareholders' agreement
Gets vesting, transfer restrictions, deadlock right
Knows Malaysian company law
Knows what's in the document today
Next year — knows the document, and everything that's changed around it

The mechanism a law firm doesn't have

1

Now

Shareholders' agreement — the founder foundation

2

Next

Structure ownership properly — Legal, corporate restructuring

3

Raising

Investor readiness — Capital & Fundraising

4

Hiring

Align employees and contributors — HR + Legal, employment contracts

5

Ongoing

Keep legal aligned with growth — Legal, business lawyer plan

6

Bespoke

Anything that doesn't fit a template — Legal advisory

The fixed, one-off fee for the Founders-tier shareholders' agreement, the entry tier for two to three founders:

RM 799what we chargeno published market rate to compare against

Bespoke legal work is usually billed by the hour, so there's no published market rate to line this fee up against — no anchor, on this tier or any of them. What's fixed is that it doesn't move once agreed.

One document, fixed fee
the company changes

This isn't a subscription — there's no month to cancel. What carries: new shareholders, new funding rounds and new governance are incorporated through amendments to what you already have, not a rebuild, and the fee was fixed before you signed, not billed by the hour. OCTIS also publishes a 30-day money-back guarantee: which services it covers, and up to what point, are written out on the guarantee page rather than promised here.

What they do well

A law firm will draft a legally sound shareholders' agreement — vesting, transfer restrictions, deadlock, reserved matters, properly done.

What their shape can't reach

The file closes when they invoice you. It doesn't stay attached to the company afterwards — to the cap table, the next hire, the next round — because none of that runs through their office.

Which one matches where you are

Three tiers, each a fixed, one-off fee, each adding provisions the tier before it does not cover:

Founders

RM 2,500RM 799

  • Vesting
  • Transfer restrictions
  • Deadlock provision

Growth

RM 4,000RM 2,500

  • Everything in Founders
  • Board composition, reserved matters
  • Drag-along / tag-along

Investor-Ready

from RM 8,000

  • Multiple share classes
  • Liquidation preferences, anti-dilution
  • Bespoke negotiation

Each tier adds the provisions the last one didn't have. Pick the one that matches your shareholder count today, not the one you might grow into.

Best time to write it

At formation, or before a new shareholder joins

Not after a disagreement starts.

Three moments this usually happens

Formation · 6-24 months in · before an investor, key hire or ESOP

The catch

Investor-Ready is priced from RM 8,000

Complexity depends on parties, share classes and investor terms — amendments aren't priced yet.

Not covered

  • Amendment cost once the company changes — not priced yet
  • Company incorporation itself — a separate service
  • Employment contracts for the people you hire — HR + Legal, separately
Do two founders need a shareholder agreement, or is it only necessary with more owners?

Most founder disputes actually happen at exactly this stage — two or three founders, ownership never documented beyond incorporation — not once there are many shareholders. A shareholders' agreement covering vesting, transfer restrictions and deadlock exists specifically for that early stage, before it's urgent.

Does a shareholder agreement need to be rewritten when a new investor joins or a funding round closes?

No — it's designed to evolve. New shareholders, new funding rounds and new governance structures are added through amendments to the existing agreement, not a full rewrite.

Isn't a company's constitution enough to cover shareholder relationships?

No — a constitution is public and covers only the structural basics. A shareholders' agreement is private and covers control, exits and disputes in far more detail; most founders don't discover the difference until they actually need it.

Why do shareholder agreements get more expensive once a startup takes on investors?

Because multiple share classes, liquidation preferences and anti-dilution provisions are genuinely bespoke negotiation, specific to the terms an investor is asking for — unlike the earlier stages, which follow a more standard structure.

The agreement is not there for the day you disagree. It is there so the disagreement is about the business, and not about who owns it.

Write it down while you still all agree what fair looks like.

Chat with us on WhatsApp